Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Don S.'s avatar

Interesting article, but far from convincing. First, the typological arguments presented, while interesting, are speculative extensions rather than explicit Biblical teaching. While Mary can be seen as a type of the New Eve or New Ark, these analogies don’t necessitate sinlessness. The Bible contains many types and shadows without requiring perfection in every detail - David was a type of Christ yet committed grave sins. Second, the phrase “full of grace” (kecharitōmenē) in Luke 1:28 doesn’t imply sinlessness but rather indicates she was highly favored by God for her specific role. Many Biblical figures were specially graced for their missions without being sinless. Third, Scripture explicitly states that “all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God” (Romans 3:23), with no exceptions listed. Mary herself acknowledged her need for a Savior in Luke 1:47, calling God “my Savior” - language inconsistent with being sinless. Fourth, the doctrine creates theological problems regarding Christ’s universal redemption. If Mary was preserved from original sin, she wouldn’t need salvation through Christ’s atonement, undermining the comprehensive nature of His work on the cross.

There is not a single piece of unambiguous Biblical data that Mary was sinless, and several pieces to the contrary. It's a false doctrine that should be rejected by Christians regardless of Catholic tradition.

Expand full comment
C. P. Benischek's avatar

To the text as well. Our Lady is “Full of Grace.” Not half full. Nor 99% full. Grace is sanctifying grace, and when “full” there is no room for sin.

Expand full comment
4 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?