5 Comments
User's avatar
Tommy's avatar

Because Paul wasn’t a radical Fundamentalist. He knew that natural revelation was important

Cameron Shaw's avatar

I think this is a good concept, but I don't think dehellenizing Christianity is as big of a danger as this is making it sound. Yes, church history and the works of the apostles should be exegeted through a lens of Greco-Roman philosophy at times, but the foundation of Christianity stands out of culture. I agree that a hypothetical, detached Christianity could be endangered, but putting in this intense of a light is wholly overcompensating and is just as dangerous. Furthermore, the line 'Christianity is rich combination of Greek, Roman, and Jewish concepts—and exploring these will enrich your spiritual life.' is a little heretical. Christianity, is Divine concepts, and while cultures and beliefs can mirror the divine, we should only base Christianity off of the specific revelations that God has given us.

Living With Presence — By Folu's avatar

Really enjoyed this article's exploration of the Graeco-Roman influence on Christianity.

It also reminds me of how Stoic concepts like virtue and logos helped created conversational bridges in the ancient world. I've been reflecting on similar themes in my own writing, so this really resonated.

Robert C Culwell's avatar

Thank you

Happy New Year

Christ is Born, Glorify Him!

Dassin Dassin's avatar

Because half of Paul’s writings weren’t written by Paul